2
Funker bra, mikker den opp og EQer vekk de fæle frekvensene elementet blåser ut.
Skal mekke en før og etter post med lydopptak når jeg bytter elementet til v30
Valveking, classic og XXX serien er mer eller mindre samme amper inni.
Sakser litt fra en sie som overbeviste meg til å kjøpe valvekingen:
Our Clean channel is exactly a copy of the Fender: Twin Reverb, Bandmaster, Champ, Blackface, etc... Everything from the EQ cap values to the bright switched is ripped from the Normal Channel of any popular Fender amp.
The Peavey Classic 30 & the Valveking are very close to each other. (Almost the same infact). The Classic 30 got the same distortion channel as the VK only with a different EQ slope resistors value. The FX loop is Exactly the same as the VK. Same gain stages. Same Phase Inverter. Same Input Jacks components. The only real difference are the EL84 Power tubes & the Cab Construction.
Mesa & Soldano has 39K on V2a and Bogner has 10k.
V1a & V1b is practicly the same on the VK as on the Mesa & Bogner (Also Peavey XXX & Classic 30)
The Valve king is Classic 30 with thicker pre-eq (caps), is also the XXX without the last 2 stages (yes all peavey amps are very similar inside), in fact all tube amps are very similar inside.
Like others have said, we're looking at a Fender clean and Marshall-ish gain channel arrangement. Peavey has their own eq curve they go by and it shows when you run the stacks through a EQ simulator, like Duncan's Tone Stack Calc. The clean is definitely patterned after a Fender, with the EQ between gain stages. The gain is a little different. Many Marshalls use cathode follower driven tone stacks, which tends to warm them up. The Valve King does not. The Valve King's EQ is exactly like a typical Marshall, but with more bottom end.
Dette innlegget har blitt endret av oystein1988: 13.02.2012 - 12:31
